shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Nate Klingenstein <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:08:48 +0000
Thanks for the technical reality check, Brent. Narrows down the short term solutions a lot.
If there are enough important additional features, or enough people are interested in the ones proposed, then I'd like to see the modernization of RequestedAttribute that Leif suggested, and with integration of consent support into the IdP slated for v3, now is certainly the time to do the design and standards work. I think these deployers could put some time towards that.
Other votes or voices?
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:24 , Leif Johansson wrote:
If you ask me - if we are going to touch RequestedAttribute we should
fix it more throughly.
- [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Nate Klingenstein, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Brent Putman, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Leif Johansson, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Nate Klingenstein, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Bernd Oberknapp, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Nate Klingenstein, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Leif Johansson, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Chad La Joie, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Tom Scavo, 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Nate Klingenstein, 02/18/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Tom Scavo, 02/18/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Rhys Smith, 02/18/2011
- [SPAM] Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Tom Scavo, 02/18/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Nate Klingenstein, 02/18/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Tom Scavo, 02/17/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Cantor, Scott E., 02/17/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Metadata for Consent, Brent Putman, 02/17/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.