shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong")

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong")

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong")
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:33:55 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> > Which would mean it's useless without third party cookies, right?
>
> No third party cookies are required. Only cookies at the IdP and at the
> SP for which a user has set cookies anyway.

I'm fairly sure that an IFRAME (or any FRAME in fact) reading or writing a
cookie *is* a third party cookie. I thought we had cleared this up when I
showed that last logout UI proposal doesn't work (wasn't that IFRAME-based?)

-- Scott

[Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Lukas Hämmerle, 12/16/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Peter Williams, 12/16/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Peter Schober, 12/16/2010
  - Re: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Lukas Hämmerle, 12/17/2010
    - RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Peter Williams, 12/17/2010
    - RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Scott Cantor, 12/17/2010
      - Re: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Eric Fazendin, 12/17/2010
        
        RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Cantor, Scott E., 12/17/2010
        
        RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Peter Williams, 12/17/2010
        
        Re: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Paul Hethmon, 12/17/2010
        
        RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Cantor, Scott E., 12/17/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong"), Cantor, Scott E., 12/16/2010

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] New IETF draft for IdP Discovery ("PingPong")