shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:57:07 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FuLQQiS0GXBolByI+hrLcaNUF/gfbrfKIY85p2emTFARG/j6XfJzC/yVyfp38hxNRI d0gNPA/dx+V7m/4AanmRitk6zPw8kGcd5OVfiZ22D5pt7oeogcwLFxunpGiVneOi5EP4 upHgpUUeK3nRJrf9h1F59EVdkycU0b0/Iuq4M=
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> I built a plugin for aggregating attributes using shared/public identifiers
> and an extremely basic security model that just emulates the ideas
> originally represented by networking LDAP servers together. It seemed to
> interest a lot of people at the last member meeting, because it avoids most
> of the harder problems that come up when privacy and user consent have to be
> dealt with. But that doesn't mean it solves those problems, nor am I
> claiming those problems shouldn't be worked on.
Any progress on the documentation front? (I'm always hesitant to ask
that question since it usually implies a willingness to write, but in
this case I wouldn't have the foggiest idea what to write! :-)
Tom
- protocols and profiles, Soner Sevinc, 10/27/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Scott Cantor, 10/27/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Tom Scavo, 10/27/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Scott Cantor, 10/27/2009
- Message not available
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Tom Scavo, 10/27/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Scott Cantor, 10/27/2009
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Peter Williams, 10/27/2009
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Tom Scavo, 10/27/2009
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Tom Scavo, 10/27/2009
- Re: [Shib-Dev] protocols and profiles, Steven_Carmody, 10/27/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.