shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] No AttributeStatement versus an empty AttributeStatement
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] No AttributeStatement versus an empty AttributeStatement
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:33:51 +0100
- Openpgp:
- Organization: SWITCH
An attribute statement with no attributes is not valid SAML, so no, you
can not do that.
Olivier Salaün wrote:
> I'm wondering if this is a standard SAML behaviour.
> Under the situation described above, shouldn't the IdP send a SAML
> assertion with an empty AttributeStatement instead of no
> AttributeStatement at all?
--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Net Services
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
http://www.switch.ch
- No AttributeStatement versus an empty AttributeStatement, Olivier Salaün, 03/12/2009
- Re: [Shib-Dev] No AttributeStatement versus an empty AttributeStatement, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] No AttributeStatement versus an empty AttributeStatement, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.