Shibboleth Developers

[Eric Norman <>]

On Sep 24, 2008, at 8:34 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

> > I can't tell whether that's agreement, disagreement, or something 
> > else.
>
> Disagreement, but I'm not sure I understood what the point was.
>
> > The suggestion was to use the above as a principle for structuring
> > (classifying) data instead of that overused "meta" prefix.
>
> Well, the SAML specification's done. The terminology is what it is. 
> I'm not sure how this helps us develop priorities and use cases for 
> the software.

I wasn't talking about SAML, and I wasn't really talking about
terminology; the word was "structure".

Feedback was solicited; I provided some.  If you don't understand
it or if it's not useful to you, it would be best to ignore it.
It might be useful to others.

Eric Norman