shibboleth-dev - RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Josh Howlett" <>
- To: <>
- Cc: "Toshiyuki Kataoka" <>, "Josh Howlett" <>
- Subject: RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:59:54 -0000
> > In the HoK artifact model, you MUST authenticate both.
> Well, I guess
> > you could authenticate the user-agent *after* the artifact is
> > resolved, but that would seem to require a slightly different
> > work-flow from that required by the other bindings.
>
> As Nate said, there's no difference here at all. Artifact use
> is entirely orthogonal to the HoK vs. bearer issue.
I understand - I'm just explaining how I got confused initially; in the
hope that it might help the more clued-up folks understand how the less
clued-up folks read these things.
josh.
JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited
by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Josh Howlett, 03/12/2008
- Re: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Nate Klingenstein, 03/12/2008
- Message not available
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Josh Howlett, 03/12/2008
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- Message not available
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Josh Howlett, 03/12/2008
- RE: Final Working Draft 01 of HoK Browser SSO, Josh Howlett, 03/12/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.