shibboleth-dev - RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:03:09 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Failed to validate untrusted credential against trusted key
>
> when processing the incoming SSO request.....
>
> My first wild guess would be that tomcat isn't passing the SPs cert
> on to the IdP in the same way that apache is... since the IdP is
> using the same metadata in both cases...
An SSO request doesn't need Apache or Tomcat to pass in the certificate,
it's inside the message (or it's a redirect and it isn't there ever).
-- Scott
- 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Steven_Carmody, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Steven_Carmody, 12/12/2007
- Re: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Brent Putman, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
- Message not available
- Re: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Brent Putman, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
- Re: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Brent Putman, 12/12/2007
- Re: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Steven_Carmody, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Steven_Carmody, 12/13/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
- Re: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Brent Putman, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Steven_Carmody, 12/12/2007
- RE: 2.0 IdP w/NO apache, security policy fails, Scott Cantor, 12/12/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.