Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Shibboleth and Kerberos Tickets

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Shibboleth and Kerberos Tickets


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Shilen Patel <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Shibboleth and Kerberos Tickets
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:24:18 -0400

The applications that receive the proxy token treat the proxy token just like a password. The applications just pass it to the backend servers, which have a PAM module to support it. Does that answer your question?

Thanks,

-- Shilen


Scott Cantor wrote:
I'd like to add a feature. In our environment, some backend servers
(such as the Sun Directory Server) do not support GSSAPI and cannot do
anything useful with a Kerberos ticket.

I don't think this discussion is about services that aren't Kerberized, that
seems kind of beside the point. If they don't do Kerberos, what would they
support that isn't password or X.509?

So for Service Providers that
use these backend servers, we pass them a proxy token that's created
from the Kerberos ticket. The proxy token is the part of the ticket
that's encrypted in the backend server's key and contains the meaningful
ticket data with the lifetime information, ip addresses, flags, etc. So
we would like the IdP to also allow passing this part of the ticket that
we use as a proxy token.

What do you do with it?
-- Scott






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page