shibboleth-dev - Re: JBoss Cache vs. Terrocotta
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Bradley Beddoes <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: JBoss Cache vs. Terrocotta
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:13:23 -0700
Hi Chad,
For our project we've used Terracotta an had a lot of success with it to date and some of that functionality would be pretty simillar to what your doing with the Shib 2.0 IdP I would imagine such as principal session replication etc.
regards,
Bradley
Chad La Joie wrote:
Just a quick poll, of people who care (or know).
Which, of these two technologies, do individuals prefer (or use) for
clustering their Java applications:
JBoss Cache (which HA-Shib currently uses)
Terrocotta (which seems to be gaining quite a bit of traction)
I'm just trying to understand which of the above technologies to use for
the initial clustering mechanism within the IdP.
- JBoss Cache vs. Terrocotta, Chad La Joie, 05/16/2007
- Re: JBoss Cache vs. Terrocotta, Bradley Beddoes, 05/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.