shibboleth-dev - possible testing strategy for Shib 2.0
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To: "Shibboleth Development" <>
- Subject: possible testing strategy for Shib 2.0
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 13:03:53 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LPMbMZNRM4q4N0M/er8vyu+RdXY9Hr+XwKpgXvTwFjFneTk6Kwc7cAUtx1Ra6n/cT/N9NjY0rpmsTN0ywqAn0vCR0RUZIp6AlqZt6iCZYbF+kDiEp/63cmAxICV9EWrw+gen7V816sUE/jO1Ssdja0bIVoJTI9cbefqHDzAdYr4=
I've extended resolvertest to output complete attribute assertions.
It seems reasonable that resolvertest could be further extended to
output authn responses complete with attributes. Such a tool suggests
the following test scenario for 2.0:
1. install J2SE and ant
2. install IdP
3a. run shibtest-idp
3b. if satisfied, goto step 4
3c. configure IdP
3d. goto step 3a
4. install Java SP
5a. run shibtest
5b. if satisfied, goto step 6
5c. configure Java SP
5d. goto step 5a
6. install tomcat
7. join testshib.org
etc.
Step 3a is the "instant gratification step". The command-line tool
shibtest-idp is the logical conclusion of resolvertest. It takes an
authn request as input and gives an authn response (with attributes)
as output. As used at step 3a, shibtest-idp simply exercises the IdP
config for a given user and relying party.
Step 5a is the "continued gratification step". The tool shibtest at
step 5a is the composition of shibtest-idp and another tool called
shibtest-sp. The latter takes an authn response as input and gives
the corresponding SSO assertion(s) as output. Used in this way,
shibtest effectively simulates IdP-initiated SSO.
To simulate SP-initiated SSO, an alternate invocation of shibtest-sp
is used at step 5a. In this case, shibtest reduces to the following
pipe (roughly):
$ shibtest-sp --request <args> | shibtest-idp <args> | shibtest-sp
--response <args>
This command outputs the SSO assertion(s) issued by the IdP as
consumed by the SP.
Note that tomcat isn't required until step 6. Installation of apache
and the C++ SP is even further down the line. This significantly
lowers the bar with respect to required technology. Does this seem
like a reasonable strategy?
Tom
- possible testing strategy for Shib 2.0, Tom Scavo, 10/07/2006
- RE: possible testing strategy for Shib 2.0, Scott Cantor, 10/08/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.