shibboleth-dev - Java SP Entrance Point
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Java SP Entrance Point
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:44:10 -0400
- Organization: UIS - middleware
On yesterday's developers call we talked for a good amount of time about how people might integrate the Java SP with their application. I took away, from the discussion, to main areas of focus:
1. What ways might web app developers expect to integrate Shibboleth into their application?
2. What available integration points does the J2EE specification allow.
Let me try to cover what I've learned having spent a day and night studying applications and the Servlet spec. First, I learned I have no life. More importantly I found the following 4 ways generally used to integrate authentication, and in particular SSO based authentication, into apps.
* Programmatic Integration - Where the developer specifically calls out to an authentication source, perhaps through some library like Acegi or more directly by making DB or LDAP calls. Providing something like this would require a pretty big learning curve and would be pretty invasive to the code itself.
* Container Integration - Where the application relies on the container to perform the authentication and the app just looks for information in the request of session. This is analogous to the way the current C++ SP works. There is no standard interface for this type of integration, either on the container side or on the application side, though on the application side there are common sense APIs that could be used.
* Servlet Integration - Where one or more servlets are deployed along with the application. The servlets handle the authentication stuff and make the data available via the session or request objects. This has the benefit of working with the J2EE standard but still requires some invasiveness.
* Filter Integration - Where a servlet filter is deployed, probably invoked based on a URL-mapping and not specific to a given servlet or set thereof. Information again is made available through the session or request. This is probably the least invasive option and the one I currently favor.
I'll note that the last three options require that the application expect information to be provided through the request or session objects. This is *not* how most web applications (Java or otherwise) work, most expect to read their own internal store of data.
I know that a number of people have piped up with the suggestion of JAAS and Tomcat realms. Let me address each. JAAS is *not* meant for web application or for SSO. It was originally an API for doing authentication in desktop apps that collected user name and passwords. Some people have managed to hack JAAS into other areas but it's pretty messy. Frankly, JAAS is just a poor AuthN API.
Tomcat realms are nice but they are Tomcat specific. If we went this route the SP would not be deployable on anything other than Tomcat (I think there would problems even with JBoss and Geronimo, which embed Tomcat).
In summary. The J2EE spec offers no standard way to perform SSO based authentication. Servlets and Filters are the only standard mechanism available and offer the smallest learning curve but still require applications to be "federation-aware".
--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124
- Java SP Entrance Point, Chad La Joie, 09/19/2006
- RE: Java SP Entrance Point, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2006
- Re: Java SP Entrance Point, Chad La Joie, 09/19/2006
- RE: Java SP Entrance Point, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2006
- Re: Java SP Entrance Point, Chad La Joie, 09/19/2006
- Re: Java SP Entrance Point, Velpi, 09/19/2006
- RE: Java SP Entrance Point, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.