Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: SAML Artifact attribute

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: SAML Artifact attribute


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Walter Hoehn <>
  • To:
  • Cc: , ,
  • Subject: Re: SAML Artifact attribute
  • Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:21:16 -0500

I haven't really gone on the record as to which of these models I think is better, and I'm not yet ready to. What is clear, I think, is that "Artifact + attribute query" doesn't make much sense in standard configurations.

-Walter


On Apr 27, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Velpi wrote:

*POST+pull=AuthN assertion through browser, attributes pulled w/ backchannel
*POST+push=assertion+attributes through browser (signed)
(*Artifact+pull: probably only useful in some specific cases)
*Artifact+push=Artifact is dereferenced through backchannel, response contains assertion+attributes in the same request/response

We prefer Artifact+push (at the present time).



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page