Shibboleth Developers

[Walter Hoehn <>]

My preference is that the tests be distributed as a part of the core  
packages.  I definitely don't want to make it harder for folks to run  
them...

-Walter


On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:34 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

> > Create one modified Mockrunner class source in our project test  
> > source
> with
> > the fixes. It will come first in the classpath search and override  
> > the
> > corresponding class in the 0.3.6 JAR.
> >
> > Create a separate test case project dependent on the shib Java  
> > project but
> > with its own classpath that uses the later Servlet library.
> >
> > I sorta like the last choice (separate project). The Integration  
> > tests
> > aren't a standard part of the distribution, so having yet another odd
> > project in the CVS isn't a problem for the newbie.
>
> I'm the last person to care, but the last two options seemed  
> attractive to
> me, and separating out this stuff into its own space seems like a  
> pretty
> useful concept. That would seem to help with the issue Walter  
> raised about
> whether you can depend on consistent IdP behavior, since you could
> conceivable package some of the code you wanted invariant and  
> reference that
> instead of the raw source.
>
> -- Scott