shibboleth-dev - Re: Attribute Exchange Profile
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Attribute Exchange Profile
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:37:05 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uRxAgvCGaJZ42aWc73Bba2x3Fe0kXkkF5KlB0wPczp1Pz5jveLbC3t+zpokf0x0764LgK7iFDjuZGn93OT5D0DXGMzHYy82nANvRzy3EAf6rX03zO1MhWILpefBLcEj7a33INKL/en3rNqzzAeDPbhXqnJJPA3JBKOKM75PcJmc=
On 11/16/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> I would have no argument with somebody that wanted to nail it down tighter
> than that. The use case for returning multiple statements of the same type
> never really existed, and is completely non-existent in 2.0.
What about the case of an IdP that requests and obtains attributes
from other IdPs? I don't have a specific use case, but should we not
rule out the possibility?
Tom
- Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
- Re: Attribute Exchange Profile, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2005
- RE: Attribute Exchange Profile, Scott Cantor, 11/16/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.