shibboleth-dev - Re: extension JAR
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: extension JAR
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:33:40 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DeZV7b0xn2t6SZyWC+gVamw8esfOwSSpp/KQCewESqTIB5K4w26fYxDmIh7Mkcsouq3kDKR7nXoTVivDuku/X3KM4fT1xHymzmxPwYcXf0LVUXnFdKbZ4T3E9eY+eHcCKw1J9LOft7Z3M1t9x2GxNd7Zc3s6tOrG/zyDlOc+Zuw=
Confirmed. See
http://bugzilla.internet2.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=419
for details.
Thanks,
Tom
On 8/18/05, Tom Scavo
<>
wrote:
> I'd like to revisit this problem. I'm pretty sure there's a bug in
> the extension build process. Here is a particular manifestation of
> the bug:
>
> - I have a subdirectory in src-conf:
> custom/gridshib-idp/src-conf/conf
> - There are files in this directory (of course) and they get added to
> gridshib-idp.jar as expected.
> - However, if I delete a file in src-conf/conf and rebuild, the file
> *still* gets added to gridshib-idp.jar, which is a bug.
> - Although the file has been deleted from src-conf/conf, it's still in
> directory
> custom/gridshib-idp/build/classes/conf
> which is presumably one reason why it still gets added to gridshib-idp.jar.
> - If I manually delete the bogus files from build/classes/conf, delete
> the entire IdP installation directory, and re-install, the deleted
> files are *still* in gridshib-idp.jar.
> - If I manually delete gridshib-idp.jar from custom/gridshib-idp/dist
> and custom/lib, the bogus files disappear (finally).
>
> So it appears that the extension directory is not getting sufficiently
> cleaned out prior to a build. Can anyone confirm this bug?
>
> Tom
>
> On 8/12/05, Chad La Joie
> <>
> wrote:
> > Assuming nothing changed between the last and most current time that you
> > ran the script than no, it won't replace the jar. It's a feature of the
> > Ant copy task, unless explicitly instructed to do so, it will not
> > overwrite an existing file with a new if there is no change (which I
> > assume it determines by file size).
> >
> > Tom Scavo wrote:
> > > Should <extension>.jar in custom/lib be replaced every time the
> > > install target is run? I think it should but experiments indicate
> > > otherwise. Is this a bug or a feature?
>
- extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/12/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Chad La Joie, 08/12/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/12/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/18/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/19/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Chad La Joie, 08/21/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/21/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Chad La Joie, 08/21/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Tom Scavo, 08/19/2005
- Re: extension JAR, Chad La Joie, 08/12/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.