shibboleth-dev - Re: Comments on the new configuration
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Howard Gilbert <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Comments on the new configuration
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 16:51:53 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MD9+hlcnfZFoFQrswzObUmcSvlSY2741ldvuTrmzJ31/lkVVohR91FikeHmK+q867DTJk2kOYl9tRC0dbEamoNJ3yNAHw9V5uAZUiJaANMe9byFEgIX1g26+nqgiY97imPiin9tNVWhlM1ENtKrJJqOnsejgwvQpO3XG/HPlkIU=
On 5/23/05, Howard Gilbert
<>
wrote:
>
> The IdP or SP will
> ignore their own entries in the Metadata file visible to them and will
> therefore not detect discrepancies between the Metadata describing them and
> the actual configuration.
Yes, which seems to suggest separate metadata files for the IdP and SP.
> Someone who encounters this code for the first time might imagine that if
> the Metadata file contains an entry for the IdP and is present in the IdP
> configuration that this information is used or at least checked.
Yes, I asked that question last week.
> One or more KeyDescriptors tell SPs how the IdP will authenticate itself. A
> single descriptor can be used for both signing and for server-TLS.
That may be true, but it's not clear by looking at the metadata
examples (or even reading the metadata spec) how to write such a
KeyDescriptor. Indeed, it doesn't seem like the 'use' attribute is
all that 'use'ful.
> I would like to add a note that when the IdP signs elements, it uses the
> Private Key included in its Credentials configuration element, and when TLS
> is used, the Server will use the Certificate and Private Key defined by the
> Web Server configuration file. An SP will then try to match the Certificates
> in the KeyDescriptors here to the ones presented in the XML Signature or SSL
> session.
Most definitely.
Tom
- Comments on the new configuration, Howard Gilbert, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- RE: Comments on the new configuration, Howard Gilbert, 05/23/2005
- RE: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- RE: Comments on the new configuration, Howard Gilbert, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- RE: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- RE: Comments on the new configuration, Howard Gilbert, 05/24/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/24/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Comments on the new configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.