shibboleth-dev - RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Thomas Lenggenhager'" <>
- Cc: "'Walter Hoehn'" <>, "'Shibboleth Developers'" <>
- Subject: RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:45:19 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> It is fine, just the attribute names are missing. Are we really the
> only ones who think that it would be helpful to have the identifiers
> of the attributes received in the service provider transaction log?
Nobody else has asked, but I don't see any problem with adding it.
-- Scott
- Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/20/2005
- RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
- Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/25/2005
- RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor, 04/25/2005
- Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/25/2005
- RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor, 04/25/2005
- Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/25/2005
- RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor, 04/25/2005
- Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/25/2005
- RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.