Shibboleth Developers

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> Am I the only one confused by the 1.1 there?  Would it not make sense 
> to rename the jar so that it is evident it's not an actual released 
> version of opensaml?  just a thought.

You're looking at unreleased Shibboleth code. There's nothing final about
anything in it. Why should we temporarily name the jar something else? We
could, I guess, but...

At least I assume you're looking at unreleased code. There's nothing
released that should have a 1.1 jar in it.

-- Scott