shibboleth-dev - RE: Matching auth to attr request

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: Matching auth to attr request

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: "'Walter Hoehn'" <>, "'Alistair Young'" <>
Cc: "'Shibboleth Dev Team'" <>
Subject: RE: Matching auth to attr request
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:46:24 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> >> No. target specifies nothing you should depend on. The spec is clear
> >> on this
> >> now. I hope to make it a dummy value in 1.3 like it should have been
> >> before.
> > why not remove it altogether if it's not to be used?
>
> Compatibility with existing deployments.

Actually, it's more than that, SAML 1.1 requires a TARGET value. We'd have
to send something regardless.

2.0 does not require RelayState, so omitting it becomes possible in the
future.

-- Scott

Matching auth to attr request, Alistair Young, 03/17/2005
- RE: Matching auth to attr request, Scott Cantor, 03/17/2005
  - Re: Matching auth to attr request, Alistair Young, 03/22/2005
    - Re: Matching auth to attr request, Walter Hoehn, 03/22/2005
      - RE: Matching auth to attr request, Scott Cantor, 03/22/2005
    - RE: Matching auth to attr request, Scott Cantor, 03/22/2005

List archive

RE: Matching auth to attr request