Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: protocol-09 posted

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: protocol-09 posted


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: protocol-09 posted
  • Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:16:26 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=EWnwDpzTHAWW3ByCvNKLohk8+l8svl7wqQRN9M20FNcMx+4bDpFfZP9hzk+psZoajtnQvkuN178ytMVcBsSxbDFNUx0baEPm3A9EycGd847voBRpIanmRE1e4e0npawbNPtTf7fPkkc4J9AsFTfWQoSKJnrcBcrXRoeZyDHJt/E=
What about holder-of-key (as in LionShare)? Are you going to address
that in the protocol spec?


On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:38:26 -0500, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> I uploaded another draft spec, should be closing in on final at this point.
> I had forgotten to include SHOULD language about use of
> <AudienceRestrictionCondition> in the assertions, so I've corrected that and
> the examples.
>
> -- Scott
>
>

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page