Shibboleth Developers

[Tom Scavo <>]

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 15:31:01 -0500, Scott Cantor 
<>
 wrote:
> 
> I don't think our implementation should be creating a
> proprietary SSO scheme within the standard one. 

I don't believe I proposed anything that goes against the
SAML1-Shibboleth specs.  The SSO profiles are *exactly* the same as
before.  The issue is one of implementation (finally! :) and I claim
separating the RM from the SP leads to more flexible implementations,
not the other way 'round.

Thanks,
Tom