Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: shib SSO profiles

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: shib SSO profiles


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: shib SSO profiles
  • Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 06:55:04 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QJTAP7sW1sXSGYy3YHA+MD2NeNAQcJebSDkpMTZj2IDiVCnazGJ/YV2YliEMnZowGaD/8ZFyyUkaTvg2P3GOx1b24r5jkeubpxWaTqhlWdKwSWy1tWBzplnnsx6RpaItzS8hbCkJoOgnipa1+AaS147lXJWxpw0bGVVY3mS4eXM=
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:31:34 -0500, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> > Here are detailed examples of the shib browser/post and
> > browser/artifact profiles (as I understand them anyway). Any comments
> > or corrections would be appreciated!
>
> Looked correct to me, although I prefer to structure the discussion as three
> profiles, a Shibboleth authn request profile, and a pair of SAML 1.1
> response profiles that have additional constraints on message content. Does
> a better job of documenting what the actual delta between Shibboleth and
> SAML is.

That makes sense, except that the value of the shire parameter is
different in each case as per our previous discussion.

Thanks, Scott.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page