perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue

From: Onno Zweers <>
To: "MacBurney, James" <>, Mark Feit <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:59:50 +0000
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=surf.nl; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=surf.nl; dkim=pass header.d=surf.nl; arc=none
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=J5Vp6TzlxC04kwRLYmmm7Zc2SHZCHHglTG3KSrzMp3o=; b=kf1qh0ZuHXFhY0Y7CfDfz/PbisyFKjqF0A+sUw1+AbMdqWcoc9RjAht2PYzz/MAw7cguZQtuuOb97pcdCXAWIKMDKHJ2w7jHyAdFxsXYrUZ98zHyWtaxfIx/MsXH4dxrHDcYgMScL/V9lkI6w2QhuOPt1bQCJ0ma5pDYhfvVSGrbxZcYnu6HkDhqXe0e/RrmZIBYPS9oipbL67fhiHvKjbkTtIXvbM2gzEamKu8saUrxwp10uqtJ8oQx/GdnLqah1Bwt1wGt36nHFJYCk+dya3ELkaLjCnC8l08thoWrizLcZNDw2LgfutmOEdHSFPapv//h6buyaqVp1STVOGG8AA==
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Gf6mgHWRYQnbnZGL0ELY4dH/BpXoykDTmeBEBkmao/hQJy84BbCrp2RPzKCHaGCP9KC3lmccIMG53NXGzKDMQ1whqzqupNIIkPKYbf3ZF3Z/NNfRPREYau1dO+kK2fozZ9EH+2ig5GgFXU0IWbJedGR8nj5iOrBZ9C8vUn1C0tf8X/fq5VGWei/slzcsR6mhoNJGUC/7LohurflYLwHoz4IJw+ZukgL77KBk7gzz3GHGvumFtz6q+Mi/t20R2ofKzvLo1ZowKNlGxKRbQw3wJ5imR9WRwfFUzsyxQp5RlEVzcxsAcUiKLxjWGA1eKln9FlG4ojz6At/aPHCZvC+Bvg==
Msip_labels:

Same here, the SHA checksum was 8d4d5142229804ccf26ec6969d0113539c5008988d2089e2f504befa1b134e34 and not the one Mark gave. I replaced it with the github version and now `pscheduler troubleshoot` is happy.

I’m not aware of ever having modified the file.

Cheers,

Onno

Van: <> namens MacBurney, James <>
Datum: vrijdag, 21 april 2023 om 00:24
Aan: Mark Feit <>, <>
Onderwerp: Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue

Mark,

the script output gave a code section to swapout, but that did not fix the problem. Using the github link to the limits.conf file actually fixed our issue.

FYI, our limits.conf file still had an Aug 20,2019 timestamp. and SHA256sum did not match the one you provided. So, it was not updated.

The link to get a working file is this: https://github.com/perfsonar/toolkit/blob/master/toolkit/perfsonar-toolkit/etc/default_service_configs/pscheduler_limits.conf

toolkit/pscheduler_limits.conf at master · perfsonar/toolkit

perfSONAR Toolkit distribution environment scripts and GUI - toolkit/pscheduler_limits.conf at master · perfsonar/toolkit

github.com

Thanks for the fast response.

James

From: Mark Feit <>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 2:28 PM
To: MacBurney, James <>; <>
Subject: Re: PS 5.0.1 limits file issue

MacBurney, James writes:

Trying to run a simple pscheduler test and it complains:

Failed to post task: Unable to complete request: Limit processor is not initialized: Limit processor is not initialized: Limit 'idleex-default' has unsupported type 'test'

There was a breaking change in the limit configuration format in 5.0 announced ahead of the release.

If your limit config is the one shipped with 4.4.x (and has a SHA256 sum of 10bc4fb31ba4bb9fdbd1624668035d76d6d6d82e12ca42c6c8fbb98cb0ace831), it should have been replaced with a valid one during the upgrade. If that did not happen, please let us know.

If yours has been customized, we have a helper script that you can download and run to recommend changes: https://github.com/perfsonar/pscheduler-limit-checker-for-5.0

--Mark

[perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue, MacBurney, James, 04/20/2023
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue, Mark Feit, 04/20/2023
  - Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue, MacBurney, James, 04/20/2023
    - Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue, Onno Zweers, 04/21/2023

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] PS 5.0.1 limits file issue