perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Robinson, John-Paul" <>
- To: Andrew Lake <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:52:58 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:EOQROBfqT1f1JQ9chIxm3c4nlGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc26YRON2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyK6/CmATRIyK3CmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TW94jEIBxrwKxd+KPjrFY7OlcS30P2594HObwlSizexfbB/IA+qoQnNq8IbnZZsJqEtxxXTv3BGYf5WxWRmJVKSmxbz+MK994N9/ipTpvws6ddOXb31cKokQ7NYCi8mM30u683wqRbDVwqP6WACXWgQjxFFHhLK7BD+Xpf2ryv6qu9w0zSUMMHqUbw5Xymp4qF2QxHqlSgHLSY0/mHJhMJtkKJVrhGvpxJ9zI7VfI6aO+FzcbnBcd8GX2dNQtpdWixHD4ihb4UPFe0BPeNAooXzu1UOqgCxBQiqBOP0zT9IgGf61rA+3eQmEQHG2hUsEcgUv3TJqNX5OroZXOe3zKnQ1zXOdO5W1i3m54TSbB8uvOyMUKt2fMHMx0cvEAbFgU+RqYzjJz6ayP8Nv3Kd7+V+SeKjk28nqwdtojex3McsjJfGhp4Lxlze6yp23Zs1KcWgSEFle96kHoBQtyacN4RsWMMuWWdotzgmyrEeop67eycLxI4hxxHBd/yKdZWD7BH7VOuJLjp0mGhpdK+jixuw60StyO7xWtOw3VtKtiZJj9fBu3MX2xDN68WLUOVx8lq91TqV2Q3e6PlIIU4qmqfYN5Isx7s9m5UcvEnHGyL5hV75g7WIekgh+uWn8f7ob7bjq5KYK4B5ig/+P6IzkcKlG+s4KBIBX22D9OS8yrLj+Ur5Ta1SgPAqlafVrJ7XKd0Gq6G7HQNZy4Ej5A2hADu819QYgGUHI0lCeBKaiYjmJkvCIOjiDfe4n1Sjjitkx+zHPr3mBJXBNH/DkKr9fbZ57E5czwkzwcpD6JJTD7ENOPPzWknvu9zEFhI0PBC4z/z6BNlh1I4SQ2CCD6yDPK7WsVKE/ucvLPONZI8Rtjb9Mf8l5/v2gH87gV8dZ7Kk3YYNZ3+jBPhpPViWYWf0jtcbDWgKphY+TPDtiFCaST5ceWyyX6wn5jE8DoKpF53DSpmwgLyawii7BIZbZmRHClCXDXfobJuIV+0NaCKUPs9ujCYEVb6/RI89yx2irhH1xKd6LrmcxysDqJi21MRp//aB0lY29CdoFIKc1X2AVWd5gjlOSjMrm7tupFR0jUyC3q5/jfIfDdFJ6ehOVA4gcIPHwvYpN9encwTNZNqWAHKvQdjuVTg3QsMZzsRIZUthTZHqxAjOxSSxBLkcjfmWH5Eu2qPaw3XrIcthkTDL2LRrxw0+T9FBLmqgj7Q66hPeHabIlVmUjaCnaf5a0SLQojSt122L6QtiVwRxV77CWzRXREzWq5HB717GBff6C6w9GhZIw4iPJrYcOY6htklPWPq2YIeWWGm2gWrlXUzSlLqRcIrnfXkc1yzBCU8C1hoe5muCKRNjXHW6u2yLCjtoGBqveE7q/eRk4FKDBk4vh0DCdEh9z/yw8x8Ri+abTqYRxqgspS4r7Th4AQX10g==
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Andy,
Thanks for the feedback. The choice makes sense and isn't too inconvenient.
I tried using the generic assist server but my client seems to still prefer localhost. Is there something I'm doing wrong?
jpr@laptop:~$ pscheduler task --debug --assist 56m-ps.sox.net throughput --source
localhost --dest 56m-ps.sox.net
2018-12-06T09:52:07 Debug started 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Assistance is from 56m-ps.sox.net 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Forcing default slip of PT5M 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Converting to spec via https://56m-ps.sox.net/pscheduler/tests/throughput/spec Submitting with assistance from 56m-ps.sox.net... 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Fetching participant list 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Spec is: {"dest": "56m-ps.sox.net", "source": "localhost", "schema": 1} 2018-12-06T09:52:07 Params are: {'spec': '{"dest": "56m-ps.sox.net", "source": "localhost", "schema": 1}'} 2018-12-06T09:52:08 Got participants: {u'participants': [u'localhost', u'56m-ps.sox.net']} 2018-12-06T09:52:08 Lead is localhost 2018-12-06T09:52:08 Pinging https://localhost/pscheduler/ 2018-12-06T09:52:08 Pinging https://localhost/pscheduler/ Unable to find pScheduler on any of localhost, localhost.
I will explore the containerized perfsonar. I like that approach. I had actually tried to build myself a container for perfsonar back in 2014 but was too new to both technologies to succeed. IIRC I ran into problems with published public endpoint addresses vs private local host addresses (akin to typical firewall issues). I assume this new tech stack is able cope with these details. Look forward to exploring it.
John-Paul From: Andrew Lake <>
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 1:45:07 PM To: Robinson, John-Paul; Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop
Hi,
There is no thin client beyond what you have described like there was in BWCTL. This is a trade-off we made to get the increased functionality of pScheduler. You are correct that the current client requires an --assist server and can only do third-party tests.
Feel free to do something like “--assist atla-pt1.es.net” if you need a server. All the assist server does is look at the parameters and tell the test where to go. After the initial lookups, the assist server is out of
the picture. Alternatively if you are doing a test where you know the source and/or dest has pScheduler, just feed one of those addresses to --assist.
Another option that is currently my personally preferred method for running perfSONAR on my laptop is to run it in Docker. We have an image in Docker Hub of the testpoint bundle. The advantage is all the dependencies on Apache, PostgreSQL, etc are isolated
within the Docker container. The container is pretty lightweight so it's quick to bring up/down as needed. I know it is not exactly the same, but I’ve found it to work reasonably well. Instructions here if you are interested: http://docs.perfsonar.net/install_docker.html
Andy
On December 5, 2018 at 2:01:04 PM, Robinson, John-Paul () wrote:
|
- [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Robinson, John-Paul, 12/05/2018
- Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Andrew Lake, 12/05/2018
- Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Robinson, John-Paul, 12/06/2018
- Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Andrew Lake, 12/06/2018
- Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Robinson, John-Paul, 12/06/2018
- Re: [perfsonar-user] running bandwidth test from a laptop, Andrew Lake, 12/05/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.