perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar UI Test Results: Source interface name/IP causing throughput and latency to be split in results
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar UI Test Results: Source interface name/IP causing throughput and latency to be split in results
Chronological Thread
- From: Michael Johnson <>
- To: "Leavitt, Jaron ()" <>
- Cc: perfsonar-user <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar UI Test Results: Source interface name/IP causing throughput and latency to be split in results
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 12:53:41 -0400
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Jaron,
Yes, this is the expected behavior. The test listing has no way of knowing
which interfaces go together, and there is currently no way to force it to do
so. The model used in the table would have to change a bit as it currently
just has source address on one side, and dest address on the other. Since
those addresses are different now, they get split.
Theoretically, we could provide a way to configure addresses you want grouped
together. I can open a feature request ticket for this if you like, but I am
not sure how much demand there is for this, this is the first time I've heard
it requested.
In the long term, we are exploring more flexible vizualization solutions that
would give you more control over things like this.
I don't think that this is what Danny was asking about, in fact he wants to
do the opposite: restrict pS to only run on one interface, if I understand
his question correctly.
Thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:15:42PM +0000, Leavitt, Jaron
()
wrote:
Good afternoon,
We recently split our OWAMP and BWCTL tests out to separate interfaces and
have noticed the results are separated based on the DNS name and IP
associated with each interface. See below for screenshot. We are wondering if
this is intended functionality and if there are any options for forcing these
together. This may have been what Danny, (devden55(at)gmail(dot)com), was
asking about on 4/26.
We are running PerfSonar verison 4.0.1, release 1.el7.centos.
Thank you,
Jaron Leavitt
<mailto:>
208-885-2111
Network Engineer 1
Information Technology Services
University of Idaho
[cid:]
--
Michael Johnson
GlobalNOC DevOps Engineer
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar UI Test Results: Source interface name/IP causing throughput and latency to be split in results, Michael Johnson, 05/01/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.