perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Kathy Benninger <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:16:47 -0500
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailer2.psc.edu vBCJGqOH031620
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Pete,
The typical recommendation is to let the system set the values for net.ipv4.tcp_mem at boot.
net.ipv4.tcp_mem values are in units of memory pages (not bytes as are the rmem and wmem settings) and are calculated based on the amount of system memory.
Kathy
On 12/7/2017 3:05 PM, pete wrote:
Hi, I've been tasked with setting up a speedtest html5 service to run on our perfsonar servers to replace NDT testing. This would run through apache via php. Their instructions ask the user to update several tcp related kernel tunings.
Does anyone have any experience or insight into how this might effect our perfsonar regular tests?
Here are our current standard tunings on our perfsonar mahcines:
net.core.wmem_max = 124928
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 16384 4194304
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 3079392 4105856 6158784
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 1000
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 60999
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = cubic
Here are the CHANGES requested:
net.core.wmem_max = 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 2096 65535 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 98304 131072 196608
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 250000
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1025 61000
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=htcp
The instructions are posted here for reference: https://github.com/adolfintel/speedtest/issues/50
Thoughts?
Thanks,
- [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings, pete, 12/07/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings, Mark Feit, 12/07/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings, pete, 12/07/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings, Kathy Benninger, 12/12/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Questions about several sysctl tunings, Mark Feit, 12/07/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.