perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Eli Dart <>
- To: Jared Schlemmer <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:25 -0700
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Jared,
My first guess is that the latency between Monterey and Sunnyvale is low enough that the test is able to recover even with that packet loss. I'll bet that a lot of the traffic that is seeing performance impact is traveling further.
Can you try a test from Monterey to Chicago or Monterey to New York? (or to someplace else more than 20 milliseconds away?)
Thanks,
Eli
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jared Schlemmer <> wrote:
We just turned up a new network endpoint that connects to an existing aggregation site via a 1gb AT&T VPLS connection and I’m seeing some interesting performance results. The sites are Monterey Bay and Sunnyvale, CA. Tests from Sunnyvale to Monterey Bay are good, but the reverse direction, Monterey Bay toward Sunnyvale, I see this:
Connecting to host port 5332
[ 16] local port 58534 connected to port 5332
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 16] 0.00-1.00 sec 110 MBytes 0.92 Gbits/sec 0 1.16 MBytes
[ 16] 1.00-2.00 sec 113 MBytes 0.95 Gbits/sec 64 553 KBytes
[ 16] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 0.93 Gbits/sec 32 498 KBytes
[ 16] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 32 434 KBytes
[ 16] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 32 362 KBytes
[ 16] 5.00-6.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 0 669 KBytes
[ 16] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 32 622 KBytes
[ 16] 7.00-8.00 sec 111 MBytes 0.93 Gbits/sec 32 574 KBytes
[ 16] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 32 519 KBytes
[ 16] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 32 458 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 16] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 0.94 Gbits/sec 288 sender
[ 16] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 0.93 Gbits/sec receiver
My questions are, a) how is it that we see retries and such a small window size and yet still get near line-rate throughput, and b) what is the real world impact of a test like this? Users at the Monterey site are reporting wildly varying performance out to the internet.
There are likely a lot of factors going on here, but I wanted to focus just on the testing between these two sites through the AT&T cloud. Any insights, theories or suggestions would be much appreciated. Thanks,
Jared Schlemmer
Network Engineer, GlobalNOC at Indiana University
Eli Dart, Network Engineer NOC: (510) 486-7600
ESnet Science Engagement Group (800) 333-7638
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Eli Dart, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Matthew J Zekauskas, 07/31/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Strange performance results - AT&T VPLS circuit, Jared Schlemmer, 07/31/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.