Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] problem with "python esmond/manage.py list" command after 3.5.1 upgrade

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] problem with "python esmond/manage.py list" command after 3.5.1 upgrade


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Humberto Galiza <>
  • To: "Christopher J. Tengi" <>
  • Cc: PerfSonar Users <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] problem with "python esmond/manage.py list" command after 3.5.1 upgrade
  • Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:50:22 -0300

Sorry, I didn’t realize there was another thread discussing the same subject.


Humberto Galiza ..::.. Senior Network Engineer
AmLight: http://www.amlight.net
AMPATH (ASN 20080): http://www.ampath.net
P:+55 (19) 3787-3367
M:+55 (19) 971-445-570
Skype: humbertogaliza

> On Mar 9, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Christopher J. Tengi
> <>
> wrote:
>
> We are using IP-based authentication on our MA, and I noticed today that we
> were getting a number of “401 UNAUTHORIZED” errors for an endpoint that I
> *thought* I had added for IP auth. So, I got onto the MA and tried using
> the list command (after doing the python27 shuffle). Here are the results:
>
> ==========
> (esmond)[root@perfsonar-ma-2
> esmond]# python esmond/manage.py list
> System check identified some issues:
>
> WARNINGS:
> api.IfRef.ipAddr: (fields.W900) IPAddressField has been deprecated. Support
> for it (except in historical migrations) will be removed in Django 1.9.
> HINT: Use GenericIPAddressField instead.
> api.LSPOpStatus.dstAddr: (fields.W900) IPAddressField has been deprecated.
> Support for it (except in historical migrations) will be removed in Django
> 1.9.
> HINT: Use GenericIPAddressField instead.
> api.LSPOpStatus.srcAddr: (fields.W900) IPAddressField has been deprecated.
> Support for it (except in historical migrations) will be removed in Django
> 1.9.
> HINT: Use GenericIPAddressField instead.
> ==========
>
> If there is another way to list the users/hosts I’ve added for IP-based
> authentication, I’d be happy to use it, but I *think* this is what I’m
> supposed to use, right? Assuming that this may be upgrade-related, please
> let me know what I can do to help resolve this issue. If it’s me, just slap
> me. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> /Chris
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page