perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Aaron Brown <>
- To: Gaetano Vocca <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:11:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: sesanv.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
Hey Gaetano,
BWCTL and OWAMP are both licensed under the Apache 2.0 license, so you’re good on that front. NDT has a slightly different license: https://ndt.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/copyright.html .
However, in my reading (IANAL), you should be good on that front as well as long as you meet the copyright notice criteria. I’m not sure what tools that underlie BWCTL you plan on using, but it’d be good to verify those as well. However, I can’t imagine that
any of them have restrictions on commercial use.
Cheers,
Aaron
|
- [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Gaetano Vocca, 03/12/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Warnke, Eric E, 03/12/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Gaetano Vocca, 03/13/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Aaron Brown, 03/12/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Aaron Brown, 03/12/2015
- R: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Gaetano Vocca, 03/12/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Aaron Brown, 03/12/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Licensing clarification, Warnke, Eric E, 03/12/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.