perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Aaron Brown <>]

Hey Gaetano,

If you’re asking if there’s a syntax problem with having a posthook like “/path/to/posthook -i -w 1024”, then no, there isn’t. The “syntax error” thing is a poor error message. bwctld tries to execute the script with the “—validate” flag when it starts up, and since it doesn’t support the parameters, it’s bombing out and printing out a syntax error message.

Cheers,

Aaron

On Jan 13, 2015, at 9:34 AM, Gaetano Vocca <> wrote:

Thank you Aaron.

Do you know if any of the bwctld.conf options foresee a blank separated list of values? In this case any change to support the command line parameters would impact this functionality.

 

Cheers

Gaetano

 

Da: Aaron Brown [mailto:] 
Inviato: martedì 13 gennaio 2015 14:15
A: Gaetano Vocca
Cc: 
Oggetto: Re: [perfsonar-user] Posthook command line parameters

 

Hey Gaetano, 

 

The posthook currently doesn’t support command-line parameters, unfortunately. It’d probably be straight-forward to add, though.

 

Cheers,

Aaron

 

On Jan 12, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Gaetano Vocca <> wrote:

 

Hi all,

is it possible to use command line parameters in a posthook definition?

Currently, if I add any, I get

 

/usr/local/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run

/etc/bwctld/bwctld.conf:233 Problem parsing config file

/etc/init.d/bwctld start: bwctld could not be started

 

When restarting bwctld. Is it as expected?

 

Thank you

Gaetano