Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Aaron Brown <>
  • To: Robert Shearman <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] TWAMP
  • Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 19:40:00 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: Brocade.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
Hey Robert,

> On Dec 23, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Robert Shearman
> <>
> wrote:
>
> I've got an RFC-compliant implementation of TWAMP working based on the
> owamp code.
>
> Would patches along these lines be likely to be accepted into owamp? Any
> guidelines on coding style, or other pitfalls to avoid?

We’d definitely be interested in the patches. As long as they’re broken up
into somewhat discrete pieces, and not just a giant patch, we’ll be happy to
take a look.

Cheers,
Aaron

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page