perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Fernando Redigolo <>
- To: Darryl K Wohlt <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:36:46 -0300
another vote on option 2
On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Darryl K Wohlt
<>
wrote:
> Option 2 will be fine for us.
>
> _____________________________
> Darryl Wohlt
> Network Architect
> Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
> (630) 840-2901
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
>
>
> [mailto:]
> On Behalf Of Jason Zurawski
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 1:09 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR
> toolkit
>
> All;
>
> Jumping into the wayback machine for this one - earlier this year we did an
> informal poll about who is using cacti, and who would be terribly bothered
> about it disappearing. At the time there was some support for it
> remaining, and some that felt it didn't provide a whole lot of value.
>
> Given the recent exploits of this product causing increased levels of
> heartburn for those in the user community, we wanted to raise the issue
> again and this time offer some possible suggestions on ways forward:
>
> Option 1: Remain the same as we operate now. Cacti is installed, it
> receives regular patches for when exploits occur, and it is 'locked down'
> to only allow administrative users on the toolkit access (e.g. the public
> viewable feature was removed a month ago after the last security
> vulnerability)
>
> Option 2: Remove cacti from the default install (not with the next release,
> but something in the near future), and provide a package (via yum) and
> instructions that would restore it for sites that want to use the tool.
>
> Your feedback is valuable as we try to balance the needs of security and
> functionality.
>
> Thanks;
>
> -jason
>
> On 13 February 2014 05:00, Brian Tierney
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> We'd like to know if anyone is currently actually using Cacti, which is
>> bundled on the perfSONAR toolkit, for collection of SNMP data.
>>
>> We are considering removing this in future releases, and wonder if anyone
>> will notice.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Tierney, http://www.es.net/tierney
>>
>> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
>>
>> Berkeley National Lab
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, (continued)
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Mark Foster, 07/09/2014
- Re: [Systems.network] [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Preuss, Don (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E], 07/09/2014
- Re: [Systems.network] [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Roderick Mooi, 07/17/2014
- Re: [Systems.network] [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Preuss, Don (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [E], 07/09/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Bigrow, John F, 07/09/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Keith Holub (NOAA Affiliate), 07/09/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Jason Chong, 07/09/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Christoph Galuschka, 07/09/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Nadim Elias El-Khoury, 07/09/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Terrence Martin, 07/17/2014
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Darryl K Wohlt, 07/17/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Fernando Redigolo, 07/18/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Re: Cacti/SNMP collection via the perfSONAR toolkit, Mark Foster, 07/09/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.