perfsonar-user - Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation
Chronological Thread
- From: Daniel Doyle <>
- To: "Tshabalala, Devine (Mr) (s210051701)" <>
- Cc: "" <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:21:00 -0400
Devine, Looking at your attached picture I feel that I might not be getting the full picture here. As you said that these are two graphs representing traffic over the same link I do not see how the SNMP monitored one can show less traffic than the BWCTL throughput test (perfSONAR). If anything I believe only the inverse could be true where the SNMP monitored one will simply show all traffic going across that link whereas the perfSONAR one will only show traffic generated from the test, which is a subset of or at most equal to the total link traffic. Before I could weigh in any more it might be helpful to double check that and/or explain a little more about your setup and what you are trying to accomplish and where these measurements are coming from. Of particular use would be to know the sampling interval on each as if the sampling for the SNMP is relatively slow, say every 5 minutes or so, that could account for the difference. Regardless though I believe that assuming they both utilize the same link the total traffic passed will be indicated on the SNMP counters. With respect to getting at the raw data in perfSONAR, you could use direct SQL access. Someone else might weigh in here differently but I would probably recommend checking out the SOAP based API for the existing Measurement Archive (MA) as it takes care of some of the more underlying bits in terms of tables and columns and joining it all together for you. I believe a decent starting point might be here: http://psps.perfsonar.net/client-doc.html . It's also worth nothing that there is a new version of the MA that is coming out with a RESTful API that should be easier to use, but that's likely a few months away and may not meet your timing needs. -Dan On May 21, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Tshabalala, Devine (Mr) (s210051701) <> wrote:
Dan Doyle GlobalNOC Software Developer 1-812-856-3892 |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
- Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Daniel Doyle, 05/20/2014
- [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Tshabalala, Devine (Mr) (s210051701), 05/21/2014
- Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Daniel Doyle, 05/21/2014
- Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Alan Whinery, 05/21/2014
- RE: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Tshabalala, Devine (Mr) (s210051701), 05/23/2014
- Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Alan Whinery, 05/21/2014
- Re: [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Daniel Doyle, 05/21/2014
- [perfSONAR-developer] [perfsonar-user] Updated Statement on Researcher Participation, Tshabalala, Devine (Mr) (s210051701), 05/21/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.