perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Amit Kumar <>]

Yes Aaron

Thanks & Regards

Amit Kumar 
Scientific Officer 
Operation and Routing Group 
M/O Communication and IT, NIC, A- Block, CGO Complex, New Delhi 
Ph. +911122900332, NKN VoIP:7332 
Mob. +919910611621

On Mar 31, 2014 7:10 PM, Aaron Brown 
<>
 wrote:
>
> Hey Amit, 
>
> Are all the hosts only synchronizing against that 10. host? 
>
> Cheers, 
> Aaron 
>
> On Mar 31, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Amit 
> <>
>  wrote: 
>
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > [root@perfdel
> >  ~]# ntpq -p 
> >     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset 
> > jitter 
> > ============================================================================
> >  
> > == 
> > 10.255.255.3    10.255.255.35    2 u  519 1024  352    1.396   -4.134 
> > 12.624 
> > chronos.es.net  .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > nms-rlat.chic.n .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > nms-rlat.hous.n .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > nms-rlat.losa.n .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > nms-rlat.newy32 .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > saturn.es.net   .INIT.          16 u    - 1024    0    0.000    0.000 
> > 0.000 
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > Amit 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Aaron Brown 
> > [mailto:]
> >  
> > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 5:51 PM 
> > To: Amit 
> > Cc: 
> > 
> >  Users; 
> > ;
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Now BWCTL issue.... 
> > 
> > Hey Amit, 
> > 
> > What's the output of 'ntpq -p' on 14.139.5.202? The fact that it's 10 
> > seconds or so offset makes me wonder. 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > Aaron 
> > 
> > On Mar 31, 2014, at 1:45 AM, Amit 
> > <>
> >  wrote: 
> > 
> >> Hi, 
> >> 
> >> I am upgrading my perfsonar servers with 64 bit, but I saw strange 
> >> issue with my BWCTL test or NTP 
> >> 
> >> When doing the bandwidth test, it shows me below errors 
> >> 
> >> [root@perfchen
> >>  ~]# bwctl -s 14.139.5.202 
> >> bwctl: Using tool: iperf 
> >> bwctl: 17 seconds until test results available 
> >> 
> >> RECEIVER START 
> >> bwctl: start_endpoint: 3605232961.453831 
> >> bwctl: run_endpoint: receiver: 14.139.5.234 
> >> bwctl: run_endpoint: sender: 14.139.5.202 
> >> 
> >> bwctl: remote peer cancelled test 
> >> bwctl: stop_tool: 3605232963.900632 
> >> bwctl: stop_endpoint: 3605232963.901162 
> >> 
> >> Owamp_bwctl Logs at 14.139.5.202: 
> >> 
> >> Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[14163]: FILE=sapi.c, LINE=353, 
> >> Connection to 
> >> (14.139.5.202:4823) from (14.139.5.234:32938) Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel 
> >> bwctld[14163]: FILE=sapi.c, LINE=510, 
> >> ControlSession([14.139.5.202]:4823) accepted from 
> >> userid(nil):([14.139.5.234]:32938) 
> >> Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[14163]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, 
> >> ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:request:duration = 10 (result = 0, limit = 30) Mar 31 
> >> 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[14163]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:request:duration = 10 (result = 0, limit = 30) Mar 31 
> >> 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[14163]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:request:max_time_error = 3 (result = 0, limit = 0) Mar 
> >> 31 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[14163]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:request:allow_tcp = 1 (result = 0, limit = 1) Mar 31 
> >> 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:request:pending = 1 (result = 0, limit = 0) Mar 31 
> >> 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=bwctld.c, LINE=698, Test 
> >> Reservation Information: Current Time: 1396244151, Fuzz: 2.711914, 
> >> Reservation Start: 1396244165, Reservation End: 1396244180, Test Start 
> > Time: 
> >> 1396244167 
> >> Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=bwctld.c, LINE=727, Time 
> >> Slots Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=bwctld.c, LINE=732, 
> >> Time 
> > Slot 1: 
> >> 1396244165 to 1396244180: 1 reservations Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel 
> >> bwctld[14164]: FILE=endpoint.c, LINE=1105, 
> >> PeerAgent: Remote clock is at least 10.051941(secs) behind local, NTP 
> >> only indicates 1.196289(secs) error, failing Mar 31 11:05:51 perfdel 
> >> bwctld[14164]: FILE=endpoint.c, LINE=1269, 
> >> PeerAgent: Killing tester with SIGKILL, pid=14165 Mar 31 11:05:53 
> >> perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=policy.c, LINE=1419, ResReq 
> >> ALLOWED: root:release:pending = 1 (result = 0, limit = 0) Mar 31 
> >> 11:05:53 perfdel bwctld[5505]: FILE=bwctld.c, LINE=727, Time Slots 
> >> 
> >> But the tests with 32 bit perfsonar are working fine: 
> >> 
> >> BWCTL versions: 1.5.1-20 (64 bit) and 1.5.1 (32 bit) 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Thanks & Regards 
> >> 
> >> Amit Kumar 
> >> Scientific Officer 
> >> Operation and Routing Group 
> >> M/O Communication and IT, NIC, A- Block, CGO Complex, New Delhi Ph. 
> >> +911122900332, NKN VoIP:7332 Mob. +919910611621 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
>