perfsonar-user - [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Jason Zurawski <>
- To: Amit <>
- Cc: " Users" <>, , perfsonar-ps-users <>
- Subject: [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:15:34 -0400
Amit;
To answer the other question:
>>> I have connected 6-7 perfsonar servers in my network. Now I would like to
>>> test the bandwidth of the link connecting these servers. So I planned to
>>> run scheduled test from server1 to other 5 servers.
>>> But It doesn’t seems to run. It shows error “remote peer cancelled test”.
>>> Also I don’t see any graph.
>>> Please find attached logs
>>>
>>> Can’t I ran more than one scheduled bandwidth test at a time?
BWCTL is a serial tester, it only lets you test one test at a time.
Thanks;
-jason
On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Aaron Brown
<>
wrote:
> Hey Amit,
>
> Could you try adding the "-i 2" flag and seeing what the result is?
>
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Amit
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not able to run any bwctl test from cli mode also and also from any
>> of 6 servers.
>> Please find below error:
>>
>> [root@localhost
>> ~]# bwctl -c 14.139.5.201 -s 14.139.5.202
>> bwctl: Using tool: iperf
>> bwctl: 16 seconds until test results available
>>
>> RECEIVER START
>> bwctl: exec_line: iperf -B 14.139.5.201 -s -f b -m -p 5103 -t 10
>> bwctl: start_tool: 3584258840.361688
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on TCP port 5103
>> Binding to local address 14.139.5.201
>> TCP window size: 87380 Byte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 15] local 14.139.5.201 port 5103 connected with 14.139.5.202 port 5103
>> bwctl: stop_exec: 3584258854.896837
>>
>> RECEIVER END
>>
>>
>> [root@localhost
>> ~]# bwctl -c 14.139.5.206 -s 14.139.5.205
>> bwctl: Using tool: iperf
>> bwctl: 16 seconds until test results available
>>
>> RECEIVER START
>> bwctl: exec_line: iperf -B 14.139.5.206 -s -f b -m -p 5018 -t 10
>> bwctl: start_tool: 3584258952.610546
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Server listening on TCP port 5018
>> Binding to local address 14.139.5.206
>> TCP window size: 87380 Byte (default)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 15] local 14.139.5.206 port 5018 connected with 14.139.5.205 port 5018
>> bwctl: local tool did not complete in allocated time frame and was killed
>> bwctl: stop_exec: 3584258967.376065
>>
>> RECEIVER END
>>
>> Please help……
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> Amit Kumar
>> Scientific Officer
>> Operation and Routing Group
>> M/O Communication and IT, NIC, A- Block, CGO Complex, New Delhi
>> Ph. 24305091, NKN VoIP:5032
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Amit
>> [mailto:]
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 7:03 PM
>> To:
>>
>> Subject: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have connected 6-7 perfsonar servers in my network. Now I would like to
>> test the bandwidth of the link connecting these servers. So I planned to
>> run scheduled test from server1 to other 5 servers.
>> But It doesn’t seems to run. It shows error “remote peer cancelled test”.
>> Also I don’t see any graph.
>> Please find attached logs
>>
>> Can’t I ran more than one scheduled bandwidth test at a time?
>>
>> Also find below output of ps auwx
>>
>> [root@localhost
>> ~]# ps auwx | grep bwctl
>> 499 22947 0.0 0.0 2816 916 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/KNOPPIX/14_139_5_201 -s [14.139.5.201]:4823 -c 14.139.5.202
>> 499 22948 0.0 0.0 2816 908 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/KNOPPIX/14_139_5_203 -s [14.139.5.203]:4823 -c 14.139.5.202
>> 499 22949 0.0 0.0 2816 912 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/KNOPPIX/14_139_5_205 -s [14.139.5.205]:4823 -c 14.139.5.202
>> 499 22950 0.0 0.0 2816 904 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/KNOPPIX/14_139_5_206 -s [14.139.5.206]:4823 -c 14.139.5.202
>> 499 22951 0.0 0.0 2816 904 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/KNOPPIX/14_139_5_207 -s [14.139.5.207]:4823 -c 14.139.5.202
>> 499 22952 0.0 0.0 2816 940 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/14_139_5_201/KNOPPIX -s 14.139.5.202 -c [14.139.5.201]:4823
>> 499 22953 0.0 0.0 2816 932 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/14_139_5_203/KNOPPIX -s 14.139.5.202 -c [14.139.5.203]:4823
>> 499 22954 0.0 0.0 2816 900 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/14_139_5_205/KNOPPIX -s 14.139.5.202 -c [14.139.5.205]:4823
>> 499 22956 0.0 0.0 2816 932 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/14_139_5_206/KNOPPIX -s 14.139.5.202 -c [14.139.5.206]:4823
>> 499 22959 0.0 0.0 2816 900 ? S 15:07 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctl -T iperf -e local5 -p -B 14.139.5.202 -q -I 600 -t 20 -d
>> 14846829.IPV4/14_139_5_207/KNOPPIX -s 14.139.5.202 -c [14.139.5.207]:4823
>> bwctl 23058 0.0 0.0 2844 764 ? Ss 15:08 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23252 0.0 0.0 3064 780 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23253 0.0 0.0 3064 784 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23254 0.0 0.0 3064 784 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23255 0.0 0.0 3064 784 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23256 0.0 0.0 3064 784 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23257 0.0 0.0 3056 788 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23258 0.0 0.0 3056 788 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23259 0.0 0.0 3056 788 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23260 0.0 0.0 3064 788 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23261 0.0 0.0 3064 788 ? S 15:17 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23382 0.0 0.0 3064 588 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23383 0.0 0.0 3064 588 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23384 0.0 0.0 3064 548 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23386 0.0 0.0 3064 548 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23388 0.0 0.0 3064 548 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23390 0.0 0.0 3064 548 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23391 0.0 0.0 3064 548 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23392 0.0 0.0 3068 624 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23393 0.0 0.0 36188 888 ? Sl 15:27 0:00 iperf -B
>> 14.139.5.202 -s -f b -m -p 5184 -t 20
>> bwctl 23394 0.0 0.0 3068 616 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23395 0.0 0.0 3068 616 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23396 0.0 0.0 3068 616 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23397 0.0 0.0 3068 616 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>> bwctl 23398 0.0 0.0 3068 616 ? S 15:27 0:00
>> /usr/bin/bwctld -c /etc/bwctld -R /var/run
>>
>> Please Help, as very soon I am going to deploy perfsonar servers into my
>> country wide network.
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> Amit Kumar
>> Scientific Officer
>> Operation and Routing Group
>> M/O Communication and IT, NIC, A- Block, CGO Complex, New Delhi
>> Ph. 24305091, NKN VoIP:5032
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Aaron Brown, 07/31/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2013
- [perfsonar-user] RE: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Amit, 07/31/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2013
- [perfsonar-user] RE: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Amit, 07/31/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] RE: BWCTL- remote peer cancelled test, Jason Zurawski, 07/31/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.