perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Sowmya Balasubramanian <>]

20 minutes will force the LS to access the DB more often. So, I would 
recommend increasing the interval.

Sowmya

On 5/31/12 12:01 PM, Murilo Vetter wrote:
> Hi Sowmya,
>
> I changed the parameter maintenance_interval to 20 in the hLS and LS daemon
> configuration. Do you think that it could help?
>
> Thanks,
> Murilo
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: 
>
> [mailto:]
>  Em nome de Sowmya
> Balasubramanian
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 31 de maio de 2012 13:58
> Para: Herbert Monteiro
> Cc: 
>
> Assunto: Re: [perfsonar-user] LS configuration questions
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> I think there is some issue with the hLS summarization. Your hLS appears in
> the gLS but there is nothing in the summarization info. I have attached the
> output for your reference.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Sowmya
>
>
> On 5/31/12 7:14 AM, Herbert Monteiro wrote:
>    
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are testing a new Command Line MP register in our  hLS 3.2.1 (our
> > old CLMP doesn't registered the eventTypes tools queried by
> > perfAdmin). But the hLS began to stop unexpectedly after a while. So
> > we decide to configure the hLS to restart every two hours. Now the
> > registers are ok but the perfAdmin doesn`t show the tools.
> >
> > I think in some possibilities?:
> >
> > * The restart time is very short for the summarization in the gLS;
> > * The hLS summarization in the gLS doesn't contain the eventtype;
> > * There is some problem with hLS summarization.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> >      
>
>