Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - RE: [perfsonar-user] Still looking at pS-SB scheduled BWCTL tests

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

RE: [perfsonar-user] Still looking at pS-SB scheduled BWCTL tests


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Bigrow, John F" <>
  • To: "Richard Carlson" <>, "Jeff W. Boote" <>
  • Cc: "Aaron Brown" <>, "Shawn McKee" <>, <>
  • Subject: RE: [perfsonar-user] Still looking at pS-SB scheduled BWCTL tests
  • Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:00:15 -0500

Hi Gents

I sent rich the gzipped logs from both BNL machines




John F. Bigrow

Brookhaven National Laboratory


(631)344-2648




-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Carlson
[mailto:]

Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 2:21 PM
To: Jeff W. Boote
Cc: Aaron Brown; Bigrow, John F; Shawn McKee;

Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Still looking at pS-SB scheduled BWCTL
tests

Jeff;

These are the log files form the receiving side. The pS-SB is running
on the BNL node.

John, would you please create a tarball of the /var/log dir on lhcmon
and email/post it on a URL?
Thanks.

Rich

On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Jeff W. Boote wrote:

> Rich - in looking at that log dir, I don't see any of the regularly
> scheduled tests... Only some on-demand ones. These logs don't seem
> to match the data you describe below... where are you seeing this
> data?
>
> jeff
>
> On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Richard Carlson wrote:
>
>> Hi Aaron;
>>
>> Charles created a tarball with a complete dump from the /var/log
>> directory on the UC machine. Unfortunately I can't tell what is
>> causing the tests to fail. I can see requests coming in from the
>> BNL node, but nothing jumps out at me as to why the test failed.
>> What should we be looking for? (I can also point you at the
>> tarball if that would help).
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Aaron Brown wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Richard Carlson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John;
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the logs. I see from the log extract that your server
>>>> is running 15 sec tests. However I see other 10 & 60 sec
>>>> requests, so I'm assuming that the 10 sec tests are from people
>>>> using the command line version (10 sec is the default test
>>>> period) and some other servers are scheduling tests via the
>>>> perfSONAR-Buoy interface on their machine.
>>>>
>>>> Here's what I see right now. Testing to/from MSU is working, but
>>>> we are loosing data. The current graphs show 7 successful tests
>>>> from MSU --> BNL starting at 1:47 am and ending at 8:27. The
>>>> 4:45 am test is missing. The graphs also show 4 tests in the
>>>> opposite direction missing 1, 3, & 6 am.
>>>>
>>>> I also see tests to/from OU with 4 tests from OU -> BNL at 1, 2,
>>>> 7, & 9 am with 3 in the opposite direction at midnight, 1, & 7
>>>> am. The rest were unsuccessful.
>>>>
>>>> I did notice that you are testing to the psum01 node, which I
>>>> think Shawn setup as the delay server so that's why none of those
>>>> work. I think you want to test to the psum02 node.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still wondering if your server is just trying to run too many
>>>> tests (19 peers in your config) and I don't know how many other
>>>> servers are requesting tests. As I see it, we can try reducing
>>>> the number of peers, or we can get the pS folks to help guide us
>>>> on determining why some tests are failing and why some peers
>>>> aren't responding at all.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff/Aaron, what log files should we be looking at to determine
>>>> what is going on?
>>>
>>> I'd take a look in /var/log/messages, the output should be going
>>> there.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Aaron
>>
>> Richard Carlson
>>
>> 1000 Oakbrook Dr
>> Ann Arbor, MI 48104
>>
>> P: 734-352-7043
>> C: 630-251-4572
>>
>

Richard Carlson

1000 Oakbrook Dr
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

P: 734-352-7043
C: 630-251-4572




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page