perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

On 2/8/10 11:59 AM, Dan Gunter wrote:
> The document is a survey of existing schemas. Is the short perfSONAR
> section the canonical documentation for the pS topology schema? (If
> not, how does this doc. affect development?)


"Potential to effect future pS development".  Yes this is a summary of 
what is out in the world (pS and NDL, etc.) but this maps the direction 
the group will be (and is) headed.  I am providing this as an FYI for 
the interested, not something to scare anyone.

-jason


> -Dan
>
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:22 AM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
>
> > Hi All;
> >
> > FYI: Comment period ends next Monday.  This document has the
> > potential to effect future pS development considerations so please
> > fwd to anyone involved who may not be subscribed to OGF
> > activities.
> >
> > -jason
> >
> > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Nml-wg] Soliciting
> > Public Comments on "Network topology descriptions in hybrid
> > networks" Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:04:29 +0100 From: Freek
> > Dijkstra<>
> >  To: Network Markup Language
> > Working 
> > Group<>
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Our first deliverable, "Network topology descriptions in hybrid
> > networks", is now soliciting public comments. If you have any
> > comments, or know anyone who like to comment on this document,
> > please do so at http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/comment.php?id=327. The
> > official public comment period ends Feb 15, 2010.
> >
> > My apologies to Paola Grosso for the very long delay (over a year)
> > between the final editing and this public comments. This was mostly
> > due to negligence and unfamiliarity of procedures on my part.
> >
> > With kind regards, Freek Dijkstra
>
> -Dan