perfsonar development work

[Slawomir Trzaszczka <>]

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:17 +0100, Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> Slawomir Trzaszczka wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 15:54 +0100, Andreas Hanemann wrote:
> >> Hi Slawek,
> >>
> >> Thank you for performing this investigation. In my opinion the 
> >> performance of the LS is acceptable with regard to these data. How do 
> >> you see the situation yourself? Are you planning further tests?
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >> Andreas
> > 
> > I agree with you, LS 2 performance is acceptable. 
> > No , I'm not planning next LS tests. Maybe eXistDB performance tests (?)
> > (stand-alone app/embedded, different connection protocol between service
> > and eXistDb).
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think testing embedded version vs. stand-alone Exist DB XML would be 
> good. Application embedded Exist seems to be the best choice now (no 
> additional installation/configuration), when exist team gave up WAR 
> distribution.
> 
> Best regards
> Maciej

Yep,

I would like to emphasize that eXist developers distributed last version
(1.4) without war package. 

"We no longer distribute a .war package as we would like to encourage
new users to start with the stand alone distribution. Running eXist
within an isolated environment helps to identify issues and avoid
unnecessary problems. However, experienced users can always repackage
the standard distribution. It only takes seconds" 

They are right, it is easy to build war package but there are a lot of
errors after deploy in tomcat.


Regards,

Slawek




> 
> 
> 
-- 
+--------------------------------------------+
 Slawomir Trzaszczka                       
                                           
 Poznan Supercomputing & Networking Center 
+--------------------------------------------+