Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] question about lsTTL parameter

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] question about lsTTL parameter


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Jeff W. Boote" <>
  • To: "Michael Bischoff" <>
  • Cc: "Maciej Glowiak" <>, "Slawomir Trzaszczka" <>,
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] question about lsTTL parameter
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:23:03 -0600

Clearly there are issues to discuss here.

On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:14 AM, Michael Bischoff wrote:

The only objection I see would be in the case of the LS only supporting high TTL values and
it's common that the service 'goes away' (thus leading to a lot of requests going nowhere)
But in practice this problem shouldn't really be a problem since: a LS implementation
probably favours discarding information as quickly as possible and also if we factor in
'locality' the ones affected the most will be the ones who also maintain the service/LS.

In practice, this is a real problem. For the global discovery system to work correctly, it is important to understand how long it will take to converge information from leaf LSs into the global state. If there are not pre-defined limits on the extents of things like the TTL value, it is not possible to model that from a global perspective.  This needs to be considered not only on how it affects the specific client/server involved, but on how it affects the global state of the system.

In general, I don't have a lot of opinion on specifically how this information is encoded in the request/response messages. The individual service developers are going to have far more opinions on that. But, I do want to think about how this affects the service discovery system as a whole. And as I implied before, I do want some time to consider if there are more session-state parameters that should be considered together with this.

I would like a couple of weeks to think about this since we are in the middle of a release cycle and don't have time to devote to it until late July. (Is there a specific time constraint on the EU side pushing that this happen quickly?)

thanks,
jeff



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page