perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Jeff W.Boote pisze:
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:39 AM, 
>
>  wrote:
>
> > Author: trzaszcz
> > Date: 2009-06-19 04:39:07 -0400 (Fri, 19 Jun 2009)
> > New Revision: 5197
>
>
> > Modified: 
> > branches/new-structure-with-base2/ps-mdm-ls/samples/requests/LSRegisterRequest.xml 
> >
> > ===================================================================
> > --- 
> > branches/new-structure-with-base2/ps-mdm-ls/samples/requests/LSRegisterRequest.xml    
> > 2009-06-18 14:44:57 UTC (rev 5196)
> > +++ 
> > branches/new-structure-with-base2/ps-mdm-ls/samples/requests/LSRegisterRequest.xml    
> > 2009-06-19 08:39:07 UTC (rev 5197)
> > @@ -4,7 +4,13 @@
> >     
> > xmlns:psservice="http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/tools/org/perfsonar/service/1.0/";
> >     xmlns:nmwgt="http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/topology/2.0/";
> >     
> > xmlns:netutil="http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/characteristic/utilization/2.0/";>
> > -
> > +
> > +
> > +   <nmwg:parameters>
> > +    <nmwg:parameter name="lsTTL">2000000000000</nmwg:parameter>
> > +   </nmwg:parameters>
> > +
> > +
>
> This parameter should be in seconds I think. (It does not matter to me 
> what you use in your config files, or as 'native' in your 
> implementation. But, we need a normalized form for the protocol messages 
> here - and I believe seconds is already in use.
>
> (I don't know for use that you are not doing seconds, but with such a 
> large number I'm guessing that you are using milliseconds...)

Fully agree we should use seconds (if it is not).
AFAIR there were miliseconds used in some parts of LS configuration 
before and such large numbers made problems in the past.

Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Ntw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. (+48 61) 8582022
http://noc.man.poznan.pl  ::: http://noc.pionier.gov.pl