perfsonar development work

["Michael Bischoff" <>]

> Nina & All;
>
>
>>>> Does everybody agree it is OK to add Vicky' MA service to the
>>>> perfsonarUI config ?
>>>
>>> If perfSONAR-UI is gLS capable, why is the MA.conf file still
>>> necessary? I would much rather we start encouraging dynamic operations of 
>>> all tools
>>> instead of relying on the wiki and the static configurations.
>>>
>> gLS support is not entirely functional, last time tested it experienced 
>> enormous delays (5
>> min to query gLS), furthermore, none of GN2 services were accessible via 
>> any gLS.  This
>> might have changed though.
>
>
> If there is a problem in the design or functionality of the gLS then
> perhaps its time to start letting myself or the current maintainer of the 
> Java API know.

I haven't been contacted for handover process or additional contract work.

> I
> have not received any bug reports or other forms of feedback for months; 
> this is not helpful
> if the service is going to get any better.
>
> We should address problems instead of ignoring them - the MA.conf
> solution is not a scalable or workable solution if we are to get adoption 
> in this framework.
>
> -jason
>
>

-michael