perfsonar development work

[Gijs Molenaar <>]

Nicolas Simar wrote:
> Yes it is.

So why don't all the packages follow this convention yet? Or am I wrong?


> Gijs Molenaar wrote:
> > I have not seen any conclusions about this on the mailinglist;
> >
> > What is the naming schema for the packages?
> >
> > is ps-mdm-flowsa-ma ps-mdm-flowsub-mp correct as what Loukik had in mind?
> >
> >
> > - gijs


--
Gijs Molenaar

fingerprint C660 BABA 4B91 4B5C EB60 7739 4385 8ABA 72EE 99CA