perfsonar development work

[Stijn Melis <>]

Hi again,

as another test, I just put the wizard.properties file from the SQL MA 
in my directory, and it still doesn't display the radiobutton groups 
correctly. I also tried changing the order number of the radiobutton to 
7 instead of 8, and I tried removing the extra property I have, but this 
also didn't help.

Am I to make some change to the code of the Handler to enable this?

Thanks a lot,

Stijn

Stijn Melis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to fix the order, by changing the order number from 10 to 90.
>
> However, the properties are still displayed, even though "no" is 
> selected (I also must note that in fact "yes" is selected on the screen, 
> while I have "no" in the file just like in the SQL MA, and there it 
> selects "no" by default). I compared my properties to the ones of the 
> SQL MA, and other that me having an extra property (which results in the 
> second radiobutton group starting at order number 8 instead of 7), I 
> can't see no difference. I attached both the part of the SSHTELNET MP, 
> and the part of the SQL MA. I'll try giving the radiobutton group order 
> number 7, and see if that helps, although it would seem strange to me 
> that this matters.
>
> Podromos, I use a screen resolution of 1280x1024. Would it be possible 
> to check if this results in the alignment for the service name, etc. at 
> the top right corner being wrong, please?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance,
>
> Stijn
>
>
> Michalis Michael wrote:
> > Hi Stijn,
> >
> >
> > For orderig I thing it would be best to not use 10, but something like 
> > 99, or something like that. There was a problem with the ordering but 
> > it slept my mind and I forgot to fix it. For the properties appearing 
> > although no is selected, please check again your wizard properties 
> > using the SQL MA properties as an example. For the alignment of the 
> > date and time, I think this is a problem with the screen resolution 
> > you are using(the web admin doesn't look good for all resolutions). 
> > Maybe you can contact Prodromos and tell him what resolution your 
> > using and maybe he could try and fix it(It should be a small change in 
> > the css file).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Michalis
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Stijn Melis 
> > <>
> > Sent: Mon, 9/8/2008 6:18pm
> > To: 
> >
> > Subject: [pS-dev] WebAdmin layout problem
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am trying to upgrade the WebAdmin for SSHTELNET MP, but I am having 
> > some trouble getting the layout right.
> >
> > The first and biggest problem (the red circles in the picture) is that 
> > the checkboxes in the eXist part of the basic configuration page (this 
> > is the only part that's updated with the new WebAdmin jar) aren't 
> > working correctly. In the AuthN and LS Registration part, when you 
> > click "yes", some other options appear, however, in the eXist part, 
> > they are already visible by default (even though "no" is selected). I 
> > checked with the SQL MA, and there this problem doesn't exist (no pun 
> > intended ;)).
> > Furthermore, the second question (i.e. "Confirm new eXist 
> > administration password:") should be a part of the "Do you wish to 
> > change the exist Admin password?" part. Yet it is situated at the top, 
> > even though it has order number 10, and depends on 8...
> >
> > A second problem (the blue circle in the picture) is the fact that at 
> > the top right op the page, the name, date and version isn't aligned 
> > correctly.
> >
> > I attached both my wizard.properties file, servlet.properties file as 
> > well as my SSHTelnetHandler.java class which does the logic behind the 
> > page.
> >
> > I checked the source code and the properties files for the SQL MA, RRD 
> > MA, and AS and I can't really find anything which I am doing 
> > different. If anyone could have a look at what I am doing wrong, I'd 
> > be most grateful.
> >
> > Should you wish more information about other files, then you can have 
> > a look in the SVN trunk. I updated the SVN with the current files I am 
> > using at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks a lot in advance,
> >
> > Stijn