perfsonar development work

[Michalis Michael <>]

Guilherme,

Try removing the check="true" attribute from the properties that is not 
necessary. You only need to add this property when these properties are going 
to determine if the rest of the group properties or sub group properties are 
going to be displayed. 



Michalis 

----- Original Message -----
From: Guilherme Fernandes 
<>
Sent: Tue, 9/9/2008 7:51pm
To: Michalis Michael 
<>
Cc: Luis Marta 
<>
 ; Nicolas Simar 
<>
 ; Perfsonar Development List 
<>
Subject: Re: [pS-dev] WebAdmin bug?

Hi Michalis,

So you're saying there's a 'parent' attribute that is set as 'yes' by 
default? Where should the parent attribute be set (have you seen the 
properties file in the other email?)? There is nothing mentioning it on 
the DTD.

Thanks,
Guilherme

Michalis Michael wrote:
> Guilherme,
>
> Using the parent attribute is optional, you only need to use when you need 
> sub-grouping inside a group. If you don't use it then the appearance will 
> be the same as the older versions.
>
>
>
> Michalis
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Guilherme Fernandes 
> <>
> Sent: Fri, 9/5/2008 9:36pm
> To: 
> Cc: Luis Marta 
> <>
>  ; Nicolas Simar 
> <>
>  ; Perfsonar Development List 
> <>
> Subject: [pS-dev] WebAdmin bug?
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Has anyone take over the WebAdmin development? It seems there's a bug 
> regarding multiple inner "check" options. It was introduced the newest 
> versions (don't know which one, but after 0.8.5). For example, in CL-MP 
> we have the option "do you want to enable authentication?", and inside 
> we have a check option for each one of the tools (i.e. "enable for 
> ping?" yes, no).
>
> But now the WebAdmin defines each of these options a "parent" check 
> option like the ones for the groups, so only the top tool appears first, 
> and if you set it as 'yes' the second tool appears, and so on.
>
> Is anyone taking care of bug fixes for the WebAdmin? In case someone is, 
> I'm attaching the wizard.properties and the generated html to speed 
> things up.
>
> Thanks,
> Guilherme
>
>