perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

David Schmitz wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to have an update about the inter-action between your
>> services and the RC of the release 3.1.
>>
>> pSUI:
>> - LS and gLS (still under development - see timetable in attachment)
>> - RRD MA (utilisation, input drops, output errors, with and without AA,
>> from one and from multiple MAs)
>> - TTSSH MP (show commands to multiple MP, one or multiple show command
>> at a time, trigger traceroute and ping)
>> - BWCTL MP (trigger some tests on-demand, with and without AA)
>> - AS (tested above)
>> - Hades MA
>>
>> Functionality to come for mid-October (LHC-OPN deployment: pS boyo -
>> priority1 and L2 status - priority 2). Specification will follow.
>>
>> CNM:
>> - LS (optional as it isn't currently used internally by the CNM)
> I will see if I can access data and can make use of it for
> the CNM, i.e. if I can find MAs/MPs associated to a particular
> domain based on the LS data.
>
>> - AS
> The CNM authentication works fine with the GIDP SASL CA and the 
> AS at http://homer.rediris.es:8080/perfSONAR-AS/services/AuthService
> (using my new GIDP account).



>> - Hades MA
> Interaction of CNM Hades metric data fetch scripts and the current
> Hades MA for Geant is working.
> 
>> - RRD MA (utilisation, input drops, output errors, with and without AA,
>> from one and from multiple MAs)
> There seems to be no testing RRD MA on 
> http://wiki.perfsonar.net/jra1-wiki/index.php/Test_Infrastructure
> mentioned.

Szymon, can you please look at it.

> But the CNM RRDMA metric fetch scripts interact fine with the current
> Geant MA 
> (http://stats.geant2.net/perfsonar/RRDMA-access/MeasurementArchiveService)
> with AA enabled, even if only 2 interfaces seem to be left being
> reported by this MA.

The GN2 MA is a former version 3.0, not a 3.1 RC.
Szymon, could you please provide an RRD MA with autz enabled (I do
apologise if this corresponds to a duplicate request - I have lost track
of the threads...)

> 
>> - Am I missing something?
> Probably, interaction of TSSH MP and CNM Java Client:
> - 
> http://mdm-2.par.fr.geant2.net:8090/geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp-NoAuthN/services/TelnetSSH
>   (without AA) seems to work fine.
> - 
> http://mdm-1.par.fr.geant2.net:8090/geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp/services/TelnetSSH
>  
>   (with AA) answers with a authentication timestamp error, 
>   but strangely enough only for the actual data requests, 
>   not for the metadata requests, 
>   i.e. you can gather the list of available routers and their commands, 
>   but can not execute the commands.

Please liaise with the developers/raise a bug if it is related to their
services.

> - 
> http://mdm-1.par.fr.geant2.net:8090/geant2-java-sshtelnet-mp-Echo/services/TelnetSSH
>   (the third one on the test infrastructure page) also responds to
>   metadata requests, but only timeouts for data requests.

Cheers,
Nicolas

> Best Regards
> David
> 
>> The test of the inter-actions should finalised in 10 working days.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Test regards ;)
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>>
>> Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
>>> Nicolas Simar 
>>> <>
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> as you know we are planning a release for the end of August. For 3.0,
>>>> the users discovered afterwards that the UI and the web-services became
>>>> not-interoperable. In order to avoid this disagreement to the users, we
>>>> should plan the test of the UI with the released software before the
>>>> release is done.
>>>>
>>>> I am suggesting two steps:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Identification of the interface changes
>>>> 2. Test the UI against the updated test infrastructure
>>>>
>>>> Question: how can the different UI identify the interface changes?
>>>> By looking at the roadmap:
>>>>
>>> http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/perfsonar/trunk/perfsonar-doc/release-management/
>>>> - RRD MA : domain field per interface
>>>> - LS: home LS, gLS
>>>> There might be some additional changes not written in the roadmap, thus
>>>> the test against the UI allows to validate if the UI is inter-operable.
>>>>
>>>> This assumes that the developers are deploying a test instance as part
>>>> of the test infrastructure. It is possible?
>>>>
>>> Yes, could you point where to download 3.1 from ?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Nina
>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________