perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Cándido Rodríguez Montes wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> El 16/06/2008, a las 16:45, Maciej Glowiak escribió:
>
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In psBase2 the NMWG implementation will be DOM-like, so all 
> > > > 'unknown' elements will be stored (or not) into generic Element.
> > > >
> > > > There will be more options to store such requests (just a string), 
> > > > etc. so I think the best 'short term' solution is leave it as is 
> > > > and wait for psBase2.
> > > The message for Candido is new development - I think it is a mistake 
> > > to define new message formats with non-XML content inside them (this 
> > > makes these messages more difficult to work with in standard parsing 
> > > libraries) due to a limitation in only one of the parsing 
> > > implementations. This is not just server side - it is all clients as 
> > > well. Especially since a work-around has been identified for that 
> > > one problematic implementation.
> >
> > Fully agree, but we're limited by the implementation, so until we do 
> > not change it, we have to use it. The simplest solution is sending it 
> > as a string, although I agree it looks unreadable and strange. We 
> > should consider it as temporary and look forward for changing it as 
> > soon as the implementation allows.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, if there are only few non-NMWG elements, they should be of 
> > course implemented as an extension to NMWG jar, otherwise we should 
> > wait for new base2 implementation.
>
> When do you expect the base2 will be released? Will it be ready for 3.1?

I don't think The Release Team has such plan. For 3.1 there are other 
priorities. But after 3.1 I'd like the top priority will be new base.

Roman