perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Maciej;

> > What do you mean by this, no muliple parameters and instead just have 
> > multiple eventTypes (I would prefer it that way, the only reason I 
> > stick in supportedEventTypes is for legacy client and servers).
>
> Jason,
>
> I meant that soon we'll be migrating (re-writting much code) to 
> perfSONAR base-2 which is under development but Roman is now working 
> on moving RRD MA to it. We may easily implement there such 
> improvements as multiple parameters or multiple eventTypes if necessary.
>
> For existing services based on current perfSONAR base and current NMWG 
> implementation it would be more difficult and time consuming, so in my 
> opinion it we should not make an effort to implementing those features 
> in current base/nmwg.


Please note that the in general the gLS (in particular the perfSONAR-PS 
beta) should and will continue to support the multiples.  There is no 
other way to complete both the summarization registration or discovery 
messages without this notion.  With your implementation not doing this, 
it will make interoperability very difficult (impossible in the case of 
synchronization between gLS instances).  I do hope that you and Roman 
can resolve this issue quickly.

-jason