perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> Joe Metzger wrote:
> > Loukik,
> > I don't think we need this.  We have already discussed putting URN's
> > into the protocol. These URN's contain a domain field. So, I think we 
> > should
> > just implement the approach that has already been discussed, instead of
> > inventing a new one.
>
> > Or, does this new proposal support some capability that URN's don't 
> > support?
> Hi Joe,
>
> I might have missed this point. URN is a great idea and I am fine with 
> using that approach. However, I am not clear where such a URN will fit 
> within the store file and the protocol and how it will help us achieve 
> the objectives discussed in Zagreb and detailed for implementation below.
>
> Can you please explain with some examples?

Hi Loukik,

How is this specification progressing?
Joe - can you give us some examples of using URNs?

Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Ntw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. (+48 61) 8582022
http://noc.man.poznan.pl  ::: http://noc.pionier.gov.pl