perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Jason Zurawski <>
- To: Nicolas Simar <>
- Cc: Fausto Vetter <>, Nina Jeliazkova <>, Martin Swany <>, Verena Venus <>, Giovanni Cesaroni <>, Roman Lapacz <>, "" <>, Martin Swany <>, "Jeff W. Boote" <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 07:08:27 -0400
- Openpgp: id=B94D59A6; url=http://people.internet2.edu/~zurawski/key.txt
- Organization: Internet2
Nicolas & Fausto;
My suggestion for the eventTypes for perfSONAR would be:
http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/characteristic/packets/nonunicast/2.0/
http://ggf.org/ns/nmwg/characteristic/packets/unicast/2.0/
If nobody comments the eventTypes names (in particular the "To-ed" from this email), we'll go for them.
I think we need to be careful with the name assignment. Even though we are proposing packet counters, we may wish to record the same behaviors that we currently do with octet counters (e.g. utilization, errors discards). Because these two data types are similar, it would be desirable to mimic the same overall structure of the octet counters.
I would propose something that keeps the hierarchy intact:
characteristic
/utilization
/octets
/packets
/unicast
/nonunicast
/errors
/octets
/packets
/unicast
/nonunicast
/discards
/octets
/packets
/unicast
/nonunicast
It also makes sense (probably more so) from this point of view but we will sacrifice backwards compatibility:
characteristic
/octets
/utilization
/errors
/discards
/packets
/unicast
/utilization
/errors
/discards
/nonunicast
/utilization
/errors
/discards
Either way should allow extension better than segregating packets into a separate branch of the characteristics hierarchy.
-jason
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Jason Zurawski, 05/05/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Joe Metzger, 05/05/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Jason Zurawski, 05/05/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Nicolas Simar, 05/14/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Jason Zurawski, 05/05/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Number of packets on the interface, Joe Metzger, 05/05/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.